Ethics in journalism is obviously not being considered when looking at the Tiger Woods animation from the Asian news. Based on three basic principles of Ethics, we see that it was a mistake, though not malicious in nature.
Firstly, the animation was inaccurate. It obviously takes artistic liberties in the drawings, and looks almost comical when speaking to a real situation affecting two people's lives. Further, it relies on second hand information, rather than firsthand reports -- which was likely unaccurate looking back on the events.
Secondly, it is not supported by the Kantian ethics. It was not being entirely truthful -- it is being reported as news, yet who knows if that's how she was swinging the golf club? Who knows how Tiger Woods was driving his car, the look on his face when he got in, or what they were doing leading up to that? The animators certainly don't.
Finally, it is not supported by Utilitarianism ethics as it causes more harm than good. It is not necessary to take time of reporters and utilize resources reporting on the Tiger Wood's incident, as it was not to improve domestic relations -- it was simply presented as an entertainment piece. If it were utilized to present a perspective on domestic violence, that would be one thing. It was not.
All in all, the animation was not helpful and not ethical in even the most minimal way. It should have never been done. It should not continue unless it can provide at least some usefulness that can be supported.
No comments:
Post a Comment